Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif calm: "We do not expect to reach an agreement in this round of negotiations. We agreed to discuss a number of issues. " Comprehensive agreement must be worked out before July 20, in response to this term is expected to complete the removal of international sanctions against Iran. The successful transformation of the "negotiations" in the "final document", however, remains in question. United States, European Union, Israel and Saudi Arabia can not repudiate the politicization of Iran's nuclear, continue to push Tehran to additional requirements not related to its nuclear program. The U.S. and Europe are trying to link unreasonably negotiations with the events in Syria, the crisis in Ukraine, Crimea decision on reunification with Russia and a sharp deterioration in relations between Moscow and the West. So it turns out that the path of Iran aspiring to becoming the first nuclear power without nuclear weapons, stood his many detractors.
Old World - in the train iranofobii U.S.
Now not only Americans, but also Europeans show clear "double standards" in its position on Iran. Head of EU diplomacy, Catherine Ashton, is not tired to alert the international community that the negotiations with Iran's nuclear program may end in vain and will not lead to the conclusion of a comprehensive agreement. On what grounds is such a gloomy forecast, Ashton prefers to conceal. In fact, the EU claims to Iran no relation to Iran's nuclear program have not. Brussels illusions to weaken the Islamic regime provokes contrived poignancy to the situation of human rights in Iran, I would like to have an office in Tehran to interfere in the internal affairs of Iran. Nothing new in response to a balanced and pragmatic diplomacy period Iranian Rouhani Europe does not offer. EU increasingly impresses American puppet acting contrary to their own interests. The Old World is becoming internationally ridiculed.
That there are, for example, European fantasies about the legitimacy of the election of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in June last year? Before this round of negotiations, the Committee for External Relations of the European Parliament voted in favor of the draft resolution, which states that in June of last year's presidential elections in Iran were held in violation of what is called "democratic standards adopted in the EU." Now, this document will be put to debate and then vote at the plenary session of the European Parliament immediately after the conclusion of the negotiations in Vienna. What vote, nearly a year after the election, which, incidentally, by the Iranian society are evaluated as a victory for common sense over conservative warnings?
Free choice of the Iranian people welcomed in dozens of countries, the new leadership proves commitment to a diplomatic solution not only for its nuclear issue, but also of regional conflicts in the Middle East, as in Syria and Afghanistan. In conditions when the Arab world through the fault of the United States and Saudi Arabia in chaos, Iran holds as the only regional power that could contribute positively to regional stability. However, the European side tend not to notice it, and, as before, look at Iran through the prism of the continuing hostility. Not only watch but also to try to act.
EU offers the Iranians to open an office in Tehran. Chairman of the Parliamentary Commission on Security and Foreign Policy Alaeddin Boroujerdi IRI Parliament disagreed with the possibility the emergence of the EU Delegation in Iran. Iranian parliamentarians have no desire to cooperate with their European counterparts, interfering in others' internal affairs. In Tehran, Kiev Maidan will not dictate and order, how to live Iranians Europe can not. Ashton did not hear nothing Iranian warning about the inadmissibility arrange provocative show among Iranian questionable opposition headed by resentful policy also close to European values, as well as Ukrainian nationalist radicals. Europe ought to be discriminating in their eagerness to please Washington. Real political weight of the EU in the international arena these days is melting before our eyes, in vain Western participants "Six" began to draw on their banner in Vienna "3 + 1", referring to the United States, Britain, France, and not having the status of a permanent member of the UN Security Council Germany. The Iranian leadership is no doubt that Russia and China to the West still have to be considered. This is true, if the West, of course, wants to successful negotiations. Now this bill had serious doubts, especially alarming ambiguous position insecure American president.
Obama - in captivity dubious concepts
White House failed to prevent Congress adopted new sanctions against Iran, and Obama is opposed to this issue was raised again. Washington while sticking to his decision to agree to the fact that Iran had a small uranium enrichment program, subject to the control and absolute ban on the use of enriched uranium for military purposes. U.S. politicians understand that the ongoing negotiations with Iran - the only way to solve its nuclear problem, but in America has its own parameters nuclear agreement with Iran, which could be acceptable to the U.S., but not satisfied with the Iranian side. Developed by a former employee of Robert Einhorn administration concept of "Preventing a nuclear Iran," as they say, became a handbook for Obama. It can be trusted. Americans believe Obama is the weakest leader of the country in the last hundred years, and its inconsistency with regard to Iran says it has no personal position clear. U.S. leader builds Iranian policy "Textbook" nuclear literacy which makes a mockery of the specialists.
The main criterion - increase "breakthrough time", ie period that will be required in the case of Iran, if the country's leadership suddenly decides to make a bomb. Americans would like to have 6-12 months, and now, allegedly, under the terms of the preliminary agreement, "breakthrough time" is only 2-3 months. That the Iranians do not intend to build nuclear weapons, not taken into account. Americans have not abandoned the delusion that Iran is trying to "quickly and quietly build a nuclear weapon." United States, assessing the trajectory of Iran's nuclear program, at the end of 2012 predicted that Iran could reach the critical potential in their studies by mid 2014. The "critical potential" American experts is defined as the point at which Iran will be able to produce enough weapons-grade uranium (or plutonium) for the production of one or more bombs. "The clock is ticking. We are not going to allow Iran constantly involved in the negotiations that lead nowhere, "- noted in the final stage of the presidential debates in 2012 Obama. Now, when the talks enter final straight, Obama again accuses Tehran. In this same concept provided that the agreement with Iran should include automatic tough UN sanctions and the United States for any violation of specified constraints. In signing the agreement, the U.S. Congress should advance to give the president authorization to use military force in case of violation by Iran of its conditions. There is a reluctance to close Iran's nuclear dossier peace agreements, "military option" remains on the table Obama, who in Iran rightly do not trust.
In the report "The U.S. strategy on non-proliferation of nuclear weapons in the face of change in the Middle East," the authors offer recipes for further action against Iran. Their overall thrust - a combination of unilateral economic sanctions and Western special operations. Diplomacy can only be retouching, correcting for the perception of the world community and other participants in the talks on the Iranian nuclear program, the inevitable flaws in U.S. policy toward Iran. And yet, and perhaps most importantly, a demonstration of interest in the negotiations, "six" with Iran is important for Washington to mask his double game against Iran.
For U.S. talks on Iran's nuclear program, as shown by the American diplomacy and actions of the White House - it's just a cover. Washington is using humane and in principle supported by the international community, including Russia, the aim to prevent the emergence of nuclear weapons still in the same state of our planet, the role which the White House has appointed Iran, in their own interests. In this connection justified the conclusion that the nuclear issue of Iran has gone beyond the legal and technical discussions and turned to the U.S. and its allies in the highly politicized dossier, which the West is trying to close with a clear geopolitical advantage for itself in the region. It is, at least, the change of policy of the Government of Iran, and in the desired form for the Americans, to replace the Islamic regime on pro-Western polity. Pursues the same goals and regional opponents of Iran in the Middle East, including Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Arabia and Israel - the doomed alliance
The closer it becomes successful completion of negotiations with Iran, the louder voices on joint preparations Israel and Saudi Arabia to attack Iran. Intelligence services of Israel and Saudi Arabia, not waiting for the outcome of the negotiations, are jointly developing plans of a possible attack on Iran. Saudi Arabia agrees to provide its airspace and air bases at the disposal of Israel if Prime Minister Netanyahu will decide on war with Tehran. Alliance is created on the basis of common hatred of the ruling elites of both countries to the Islamic Republic. Tel Aviv has mobilized all its resources Jewish lobbying and advocacy in the U.S., Riyadh directs its financial resources to bribe the Europeans, in particular, France, concluding with her military deal and forcing her to get in the way of a peace agreement by the six powers and Iran.
The current Israeli leadership believes that the main security threat to the Jewish state comes from Iran. As the settlement of the Iranian nuclear issue and exit the Islamic Republic's international isolation and unilateral sanctions of the West, as forecast in Tel Aviv, Tehran will intensify and increase the threat. In the foreseeable future Iran could militarily and economically to become comparable with Israel, in the longer term, taking into account the enormous potential for human, industrial raw materials and resources Tehran able to take the position of the regional superpower. This is the general context of the Israeli approach to all matters of direct or indirect relation to the Iranian regime.
During Obama's recent trip to Riyadh U.S. efforts to stop the anti-Iranian hysteria of the royal family and reassure the Saudis have failed. Monarchy requires Washington to abandon the "bad" deal with Iran. From Tehran, by the way, Saudi Arabia brewing energy war target in anticipation of the abolition of the oil embargo against the United States and the European Union Iran. Iran return to their energy markets directly affect Saudi Arabia, which the U.S. used as scab and made contrary to the decisions of OPEC replaced in some countries Iranian oil. Most of the Iranian Kingdom quota caught, and now Tehran intends to put before OPEC question of returning to the usual order. Riyadh is obliged to agree with the just demands of Iran, and he will have to reduce its own production, at least a third. In this situation, Saudi Arabia advantageous to inhibit the abolition of the oil embargo against Iran, which means failure to achieve a successful conclusion of the negotiations on the Iranian nuclear program. Saudis in the fight against Iran are willing to take extreme measures, including the terror of someone else's hands, or rather, with Pakistan.
Pakistan - the dark horse under saddle Riyadh
The success of the Iranian nuclear issue in Saudi Arabia meet a direct challenge to the international community. Riyadh has resorted to blackmail, threatening to acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan. The paradox is that while the "Six" responsible UN agrees on Iran's failure to assure the possession of weapons of mass destruction, the Saudis reminisce about their nuclear ambitions. Saudi Arabia intends to do everything possible to keep up with Iran. In its plans - construction of 16 commercial nuclear reactors by 2030 and the desire to establish a full cycle of uranium enrichment. Appropriate technology can be purchased in Pakistan. We are talking about the possibility of turning the Iranian-Saudi regional rivalry in the global nature of the conflict in the most dangerous version - "nuclear arms race" in which retracts and Pakistan.
About Pakistan decided to recall mainly due to its destabilizing role in Afghanistan, where Islamabad's policy has always supported financially by Saudi Arabia and invariably directed against Iran. Afghanistan Taliban era was a direct challenge to the security of Iran, Tehran rob enormous resources and require direct involvement in the Afghan conflict on the side of the Northern Alliance. Now the Saudis would like to revive the Iran-Pakistan confrontation. You bet on the conflict between Sunnis and Shiites. In Pakistan become a daily occurrence operations of local anti-Shia extremists killed in 2013, more than 600 Shiites. Border with Pakistan, Iran becomes the front line of this, most recently five Iranian border police employees were taken hostage by a Sunni terrorist group "Jaish al-Adl", supported by Saudi Arabia. Iranian Interior Minister Abdolreza Rahmani Fazli said that Tehran "considers its right to intervene and create a new sphere of security for your protection."
Result of the influence of Riyadh to Islamabad Pakistani leadership was the decision to abandon the project to supply Iranian gas to Pakistan. Minister of Petroleum and Natural Resources of Pakistan Shahid Abbasi led Hakan absurd explanation: "because international sanctions continue, practical project work will not be undertaken." According to him, even if the pipeline is built, Pakistan will not be able to buy Iranian gas to cancellation or easing of sanctions. At a time when European and Asian energy companies plan to resume cooperation with Iran in anticipation of emergency lifting of sanctions in sharp need for Iranian gas to Pakistan doubts successful nuclear talks. That Iran has almost completed the construction of its section of the pipeline, Islamabad does not bother. Saudis generously paid service, make an order valued at $ 1.5 billion for the supply of obsolete Pakistani weapons to Syria.
Principled position of Moscow to resolve the Iranian nuclear issue, which is known partners and has not changed for several years, is not subject to reasons. The Russian approach is based on the recognition of Iran's right to enrich uranium as part of its inalienable rights in accordance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons for mandatory Iranian nuclear program under comprehensive international control. If such an agreement is reached, then Russia offers to remove all sanctions and in full.
Recall that the presence of UN sanctions preclude the entry of Iran into the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, whose growing influence in the interest of peace and stability in Central Asia. Output of Iran's international isolation increase Tehran's influence in the Middle East that Russia, which has strong partnerships with Iran, will likely profitable. Russia opposes sanctions also because the economic and trade blockade attributes have always been preparing for war, and the possible closure of the Iranian nuclear issue through military force still in the United States and Israel on the agenda has not been withdrawn.
Daniel Unknown
См. также:
GE Energy предлагает экономичное решение для учета электроэнергии
Курс на энергосбережение: что надо поменять